6/11/2023 0 Comments Paraview volume rendering![]() ![]() Then there is a an extracted block index box and a select mapper drop down menu with a a choice of “Project tetra, Z sweep, Bunky ray cast, Resample to Image”. ![]() In the F17 case when I use the extract block filter and extract the internal mesh and then change the representation to volume I can’t choose the volume rendering mode anymore as I can with the wavelet example.Does the file format make a difference in the rendering time? So should I change the openfoam data to vtk or any other data type?.Is there a video/wiki/tutorial on how to improve the render time while working before a full render is required?.So I have a couple of questions that I need some assistance on. The motor bike data is 77.2 mb and the F17 data is 17.5 mb. I have also tried the F-17 tutorial results on my mac and it works better in 5.6 than 5.7. On my mac it can’t do the render in 5.7 however it can do it in 5.6 and it is faster than my desktop. The graphics card is also not showing about 5 % activity during the render while the CPU is running at max ( only one core as I was not running in MPI mode at the time but I will give it a try) ![]() So what I have done is run the motorBike openfoam case in version 6 and have attempted to do the volume rendering of the velocity of the air for the motorBikeLES results however it takes about a minute to do the rendering on my desktop computer running windows 10 in paraview version 5.7. I also have an Apple Mac bookpro (early 2013) with and i7, 16 GB ram, nvidia 650M running Catalina I am new to Paraview and need some assistance in what I can do to reduce the time to do volume rendering.ġ6 GB ram (going to be upgrading to 64 GB soon) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |